There was absolutely nothing new about the ‘advice’ side of the business but plenty of interesting stuff on automation. Let’s not beat around the bush, I think automated forms of advice for many people will be an absolute godsend as the regulators and governments in their ‘wisdom’ regulate away the possibility of human advice from many people who desperately need it.

Globally we’re faced with an almighty challenge to overcome illiteracy – financial illiteracy and as long as we have that problem most people won’t be able to help themselves when it comes to their finances. Indeed left to their own devices most people do fuck it up when it comes to such an emotive subject as money. I really wonder what’s going to happen to some of these Robo-advisers when the shit hits the fan and you know it always does. I seriously wonder how happy people will be to follow their account as it is sensibly rebalanced and buying into a falling market without someone there to explain to them why this is sensible.

When people invest they need to be educated, we need to explain to them how they are going to feel when bad things happen to their portfolio and what we’re going to do about it. We don’t need to do it with lots of complicated tables and figures but with pictures and comparisons to other situations in life that they can relate to and we need to be able to listen to how they react and how their emotions are influencing their thinking. That is something that humans do best. Until now I haven’t come across a machine that can compete in that arena.

So why might Robo-Advisers be a traditional adviser’s best friend? Simply because of the rethinking of the technology that we use in finance. I see the technology they are using of being of huge use to traditional advisers by simplifying a multitude of routine tasks and enabling advisers to collect, collate, apply and present data in a manner that is more intuitive, less intrusive and more applicable. As I said in my previous post, in our industry we have become masters of deception and obfuscation. If technology can help remove any of this layer of fog that the industry has set up and makes it easier for people to get sensible advice that they can apply consistently it will be welcome. We have to lower the hurdles that people feel confronted by when seeking financial advice and then we have to lower the hurdles in their way on the path to getting to where they want to with their finances and their lives.

Av: Richard Stott, Founding Partner i Connectum

Del innlegget:

There was absolutely nothing new about the ‘advice’ side of the business but plenty of interesting stuff on automation. Let’s not beat around the bush, I think automated forms of advice for many people will be an absolute godsend as the regulators and governments in their ‘wisdom’ regulate away the possibility of human advice from many people who desperately need it.

Globally we’re faced with an almighty challenge to overcome illiteracy – financial illiteracy and as long as we have that problem most people won’t be able to help themselves when it comes to their finances. Indeed left to their own devices most people do fuck it up when it comes to such an emotive subject as money. I really wonder what’s going to happen to some of these Robo-advisers when the shit hits the fan and you know it always does. I seriously wonder how happy people will be to follow their account as it is sensibly rebalanced and buying into a falling market without someone there to explain to them why this is sensible.

When people invest they need to be educated, we need to explain to them how they are going to feel when bad things happen to their portfolio and what we’re going to do about it. We don’t need to do it with lots of complicated tables and figures but with pictures and comparisons to other situations in life that they can relate to and we need to be able to listen to how they react and how their emotions are influencing their thinking. That is something that humans do best. Until now I haven’t come across a machine that can compete in that arena.

So why might Robo-Advisers be a traditional adviser’s best friend? Simply because of the rethinking of the technology that we use in finance. I see the technology they are using of being of huge use to traditional advisers by simplifying a multitude of routine tasks and enabling advisers to collect, collate, apply and present data in a manner that is more intuitive, less intrusive and more applicable. As I said in my previous post, in our industry we have become masters of deception and obfuscation. If technology can help remove any of this layer of fog that the industry has set up and makes it easier for people to get sensible advice that they can apply consistently it will be welcome. We have to lower the hurdles that people feel confronted by when seeking financial advice and then we have to lower the hurdles in their way on the path to getting to where they want to with their finances and their lives.

Av: Richard Stott, Founding Partner i Connectum

Del inlägget:

There was absolutely nothing new about the ‘advice’ side of the business but plenty of interesting stuff on automation. Let’s not beat around the bush, I think automated forms of advice for many people will be an absolute godsend as the regulators and governments in their ‘wisdom’ regulate away the possibility of human advice from many people who desperately need it.

Globally we’re faced with an almighty challenge to overcome illiteracy – financial illiteracy and as long as we have that problem most people won’t be able to help themselves when it comes to their finances. Indeed left to their own devices most people do fuck it up when it comes to such an emotive subject as money. I really wonder what’s going to happen to some of these Robo-advisers when the shit hits the fan and you know it always does. I seriously wonder how happy people will be to follow their account as it is sensibly rebalanced and buying into a falling market without someone there to explain to them why this is sensible.

When people invest they need to be educated, we need to explain to them how they are going to feel when bad things happen to their portfolio and what we’re going to do about it. We don’t need to do it with lots of complicated tables and figures but with pictures and comparisons to other situations in life that they can relate to and we need to be able to listen to how they react and how their emotions are influencing their thinking. That is something that humans do best. Until now I haven’t come across a machine that can compete in that arena.

So why might Robo-Advisers be a traditional adviser’s best friend? Simply because of the rethinking of the technology that we use in finance. I see the technology they are using of being of huge use to traditional advisers by simplifying a multitude of routine tasks and enabling advisers to collect, collate, apply and present data in a manner that is more intuitive, less intrusive and more applicable. As I said in my previous post, in our industry we have become masters of deception and obfuscation. If technology can help remove any of this layer of fog that the industry has set up and makes it easier for people to get sensible advice that they can apply consistently it will be welcome. We have to lower the hurdles that people feel confronted by when seeking financial advice and then we have to lower the hurdles in their way on the path to getting to where they want to with their finances and their lives.

By: Richard Stott, Founding Partner, Connectum

Share this:

I recently returned from what I consider to be one of the best finance industry conferences around, the CFA Institute Annual Conference. It’s always an impressive affair, this year attending were over 2’000 of some of the finance industry’s most highly educated professionals, prominent finance journalists, industry thought leaders and yours truly! The list of speakers is always impressive and usually very wide ranging.

This year there were well known non finance names such as Daniel Goleman and Sir Bob Geldof as well as a host of leading thinkers speaking on various financial and strategy related topics. A lot of the content was excellent. Thought provoking and well delivered. Following a few exchanges over the last couple of days on Twitter it strikes me however that these sorts of conferences probably spend too much time focussing on things our clients care little about.

Designed to protect the illusion

The finance industry is obsessed with numbers and formulae, constantly seeking to find better explanations for market behaviour that we may never properly understand completely, looking to lower risk and constantly seeking to eek out a few extra percentage points of return. The vast majority of private clients couldn’t give a stuff about this finance industry bullshit. It’s largely navel gazing and designed to protect the illusion that we’re so much smarter than our clients when it comes to finance that they need to pay away an unsustainable amount of their investments in return for our services.

Trust me I’ve been there. I was basically told by my former employer that I had to go out and sell a fund they were launching but couldn’t deliver full transparency on the underlying managers they were using (it was a hedge fund of funds) due to various confidentiality agreements but that the managers were so large and exclusive that they need have no worries. What a pile of crap!

Big important stuff!

Most of our clients focus mainly on getting from point A to point B with their finances. They may want to ensure they have enough in retirement, they may want to provide for their children or grandchildren’s education, give to charity etc etc – big important stuff. Most of them couldn’t give a stuff about whether what gets them there does so with 16% standard deviation or 14% standard deviation. Most of them couldn’t give a stuff whether the funds we use have an active share better than their peers or whether the funds add value though a three factor of five factor model. All of that is to be honest a load of bollocks. The fact is we’re much further away from being as accurate in our assessments of what are our clients are really after than we are in our assessment of the sources of returns from our portfolios.

How often when you go to buy a car do you make a decision based upon a difference in fuel consumption of 3%, a difference in engine power of 15 brake horsepower? You look for something that will meet multiple goals. The last time we went through the exercise of buying a car eight years ago, we needed something big enough for three (hopefully four) people, luggage capacity for a Scandinavian style pushchair, good fuel consumption and environmentally friendly. We ended up with a Toyota Prius and have to say it has met all of our needs admirably, coupled with excellent aftercare from our supplier. We were in a decent position to be able to assess our own needs in that situation but when it comes to our finances, most of us struggle without guidance to properly assess what we need. If we spent more time focussing on ways and means of doing this and doing it well, differences in standard deviation, adherence to the benchmark etc would pale in comparison to our ability to get our clients closer to where they want to be in a manner they feel happy with.

The foundation of relationships

We need to get better at the people side of our business. How we understand and relate to our clients – empathy. This should outweigh any other focus within financial services. In his speech to the CFA Conference Daniel Goleman Goleman said there are three kinds of empathy:

Cognitive empathy: You understand how a person thinks about things.

Emotional empathy: You tune into the other person. You can build rapport or chemistry.

Empathic concern: That’s what Goleman calls “the Good Samaritan empathy,” or caring about people.

Empathy is the foundation of relationships, Goleman said. The better we get at these skills the better will be the results we produce for our clients.

Broaden your way of thinking

My recommendation therefore: forget that latest book about some new fangled portfolio construction model (it will probably do sweet FA for your results anyway) and read something that can help you relate to other people more effectively or broaden your way of thinking. Try looking anew at the sort of conversations you have with your clients. Are there ways in which you could get to understand them better? Together with my business partner I for one will be reassessing how we interact with our clients with a view to working out where they want to get to and how they’d like to get there and I’ll be talking as little as possible to them about how wonderful our investment strategy is. After all most of them would rather watch paint dry. All of this empathy and understanding is the big stuff. The numbers and formulae etc the little stuff. Only when we get better at the Big Stuff and actually use it properly will the public start to trust the financial services industry again.

I’d like to thank my friend Lauren Foster for her excellent write up of Daniel Goleman’s presentation which I blatantly cribbed from. Thanks to Ben Carlson, Philippe Maupas, John Bowman and Robin Powell for the recent exchange of Tweets on the ‘Big Stuff’ and apologies to any investment nerds I’ve offended (fear not, I like the techy side of our business and am happy to discuss it but this stuff matters more). And to all those offended by any of my language – do one! You’ve heard far worse on any drive to work listening to the radio when a rap tune comes on.

Av: Richard Stott, Founding Partner i Connectum

Del innlegget:

I recently returned from what I consider to be one of the best finance industry conferences around, the CFA Institute Annual Conference. It’s always an impressive affair, this year attending were over 2’000 of some of the finance industry’s most highly educated professionals, prominent finance journalists, industry thought leaders and yours trauly! The list of speakers is always impressive and usually very wide ranging.

This year there were well known non finance names such as Daniel Goleman and Sir Bob Geldof as well as a host of leading thinkers speaking on various financial and strategy related topics. A lot of the content was excellent. Thought provoking and well delivered. Following a few exchanges over the last couple of days on Twitter it strikes me however that these sorts of conferences probably spend too much time focussing on things our clients care little about.

Designed to protect the illusion

The finance industry is obsessed with numbers and formulae, constantly seeking to find better explanations for market behaviour that we may never properly understand completely, looking to lower risk and constantly seeking to eek out a few extra percentage points of return. The vast majority of private clients couldn’t give a stuff about this finance industry bullshit. It’s largely navel gazing and designed to protect the illusion that we’re so much smarter than our clients when it comes to finance that they need to pay away an unsustainable amount of their investments in return for our services.

Trust me I’ve been there. I was basically told by my former employer that I had to go out and sell a fund they were launching but couldn’t deliver full transparency on the underlying managers they were using (it was a hedge fund of funds) due to various confidentiality agreements but that the managers were so large and exclusive that they need have no worries. What a pile of crap!

Big important stuff!

Most of our clients focus mainly on getting from point A to point B with their finances. They may want to ensure they have enough in retirement, they may want to provide for their children or grandchildren’s education, give to charity etc etc – big important stuff. Most of them couldn’t give a stuff about whether what gets them there does so with 16% standard deviation or 14% standard deviation. Most of them couldn’t give a stuff whether the funds we use have an active share better than their peers or whether the funds add value though a three factor of five factor model. All of that is to be honest a load of bollocks. The fact is we’re much further away from being as accurate in our assessments of what are our clients are really after than we are in our assessment of the sources of returns from our portfolios.

How often when you go to buy a car do you make a decision based upon a difference in fuel consumption of 3%, a difference in engine power of 15 brake horsepower? You look for something that will meet multiple goals. The last time we went through the exercise of buying a car eight years ago, we needed something big enough for three (hopefully four) people, luggage capacity for a Scandinavian style pushchair, good fuel consumption and environmentally friendly. We ended up with a Toyota Prius and have to say it has met all of our needs admirably, coupled with excellent aftercare from our supplier. We were in a decent position to be able to assess our own needs in that situation but when it comes to our finances, most of us struggle without guidance to properly assess what we need. If we spent more time focussing on ways and means of doing this and doing it well, differences in standard deviation, adherence to the benchmark etc would pale in comparison to our ability to get our clients closer to where they want to be in a manner they feel happy with.

The foundation of relationships

We need to get better at the people side of our business. How we understand and relate to our clients – empathy. This should outweigh any other focus within financial services. In his speech to the CFA Conference Daniel Goleman Goleman said there are three kinds of empathy:

Cognitive empathy: You understand how a person thinks about things.

Emotional empathy: You tune into the other person. You can build rapport or chemistry.

Empathic concern: That’s what Goleman calls “the Good Samaritan empathy,” or caring about people.

Empathy is the foundation of relationships, Goleman said. The better we get at these skills the better will be the results we produce for our clients.

Broaden your way of thinking

My recommendation therefore: forget that latest book about some new fangled portfolio construction model (it will probably do sweet FA for your results anyway) and read something that can help you relate to other people more effectively or broaden your way of thinking. Try looking anew at the sort of conversations you have with your clients. Are there ways in which you could get to understand them better? Together with my business partner I for one will be reassessing how we interact with our clients with a view to working out where they want to get to and how they’d like to get there and I’ll be talking as little as possible to them about how wonderful our investment strategy is. After all most of them would rather watch paint dry. All of this empathy and understanding is the big stuff. The numbers and formulae etc the little stuff. Only when we get better at the Big Stuff and actually use it properly will the public start to trust the financial services industry again.

I’d like to thank my friend Lauren Foster for her excellent write up of Daniel Goleman’s presentation which I blatantly cribbed from. Thanks to Ben Carlson, Philippe Maupas, John Bowman and Robin Powell for the recent exchange of Tweets on the ‘Big Stuff’ and apologies to any investment nerds I’ve offended (fear not, I like the techy side of our business and am happy to discuss it but this stuff matters more). And to all those offended by any of my language – do one! You’ve heard far worse on any drive to work listening to the radio when a rap tune comes on.

Av: Richard Stott, Founding Partner i Connectum

Del inlägget: